Buddhism Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Buddhism - Research Paper Example Darwin’s theory of evolution erupted a great deal of debate as it challenged traditional religious explanations of the world and nature (Boeree). His work encouraged further research into the concept of evolution and other unsolved mysteries of life at the time. Therefore, it is important to explore the evolutionary theory from various religious perspectives in order to understand how the theory fits in, and this paper focuses on the Christian and Buddhist view of the evolution theory. It is a popular belief in the world that man and all of nature was created by a sacred deity for whom all mankind ought to be grateful. This is evidenced in Christianity with enormous reference to the story of creation in the Bible. However, the evolution theory serves to upset this belief at the expense of most believers who find it imperative to defend and preserve it. Among Christian scholars and believers, the evolution theory denies the role by God as the sole creator of the world while mos t scientific research ignore divine activity. This is achieved by the proposition of antitheist theories by renowned naturalists who suggest the existence of the world is due to a less explored scientific phenomenon. As such, Christians have always voiced their concerns on scientific theories that contradict the creation theory. The clergy and the Christian community have always united to call for the rejection of the naturalism theories based on philosophical, theological, and historical grounds. As a result, Christianity and the scientific community have always being at loggerheads with each other. Universally, Christians fail to understand how God’s involvement in creation is recognized in events that lack scientific explanations while His overall role is ignored. This illustrates how meaningful divine action is shelved only do be adopted where gaps in human knowledge prevail and a scientific description is lacking (Miller 8). As such, naturalistic proposals such as the ev olution theory serves to belittle divine action thus fuel conflict between science and the Christian faith. For instance, Christians and scientists differ on the role of pain, suffering, and death in the world. Among Christians, it is widely accepted that God exercises His sovereignty, transcendence, and providence with regard to natural evil that creates pain and suffering. On the hand, the scientific community readily accepts the theory of natural selection in which Darwin believed that all species had a common ancestor, but evolved to survive due to the process of natural selection. Organisms that fail to adapt to their habitat do not prevail under the new environmental conditions and hence, cannot survive, which explains natural selection where only the strong and mighty thrive effectively. While the scriptures present the evidence of God’s work, scientific theories, in their capacity cast doubts among believers who find themselves convinced by scientific evidence. It is evident that those who profess Christianity have no problem in adopting various concepts and exploits in science, as seen in the adoration given to the laws of science and physics. For this reason, most Christians tend to believe in some aspects of the evolution theory, leaving a majority of them confused since they fail to integrate scientific concepts to their religious beliefs. The

Prohibition of Unsolicited Parties Act 2010 Essay

Prohibition of Unsolicited Parties Act 2010 - Essay Example This paper illustrates that Tom works in the particular business as a sales assistant. His duties are limited, according to the employment contract related to the particular position; the supervision of the organization’s premises is not part of Tom’s duties but his job is related only to sales. The manageress of the business asks Tom to keep an eye on the business while she will be abroad; this means that Tom has acquired the right to have access to the business even when it is closed. However, this right is related only to the check of status/ safety of premises and is not expanded to other rights, at least as explained in the case study. Tom asks his friends to visit a specific part of the business for participating in a party that Tom has organized because of his birthday. This action of Tom is out of his powers, as given by the manageress. Furthermore, Tom uses his e-mail for inviting his friends. The specific means of communication is exposed to risks; the phenome non of technical failures of e-mails is quite common. Still, the specific technical problem is rather unusual. This means that Tom could not expect that his invitation would reach all his e-mail contacts, especially if in the past he had faced no such issue when using the specific e-mail service. The above facts should be taken into consideration when deciding on the overall liability of Tom in regard to the particular case. The individuals who joined the party of Tom were welcomed to participate. There was no warning made to them in regard to the mistake and the need for them to leave the place. At this point, the liability of Tom could not be doubted. It was only under the intervention of a neighbor that the party stopped since the police were also asked to intervene. The liability of Tom, as related to the above facts, will be analyzed by referring to the Act under examination, as influenced by relevant provisions of the UK law.